Go MI5! Woo hoo!
Hey MI5, can you guys send me a list of nutters you're persecuting? So
I can help?
MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 15 May, 1998
>
> The persecution has been quite severe for the last week. It appears that
> my enemies are reacting to the steady stream of faxes making their way
> over the Atlantic to the fax machines of Westminster politicians and the
> media. Here is whats happened in the last few days;
>
> The week started off with an incident in the cafeteria at a local
shopping
> centre where I habitually drink my morning coffee. My enemies have
> concentrated since winter 1995/96 on throwing a particularly horrible
> ***ual slander against me. They "put people up" to repeat this slander
> against me, and this is what happened again here.
>
> On Thursday morning (yesterday), instead of going to the usual cafeteria
I
> went to a nearby convenience store for coffee. The same horrible ***ual
> slander was shouted at me very loudly by a member of staff as I walked
> into the store. This was the first time I had ever bought morning coffee
> in that shop. The other staff obviously knew what was going on, one of
> them said, "they screwed up my life".
>
> The fax gateway I use to send these faxes to the UK has been working
hard
> these last few days to shut down my access by barring the accounts I use
> to send these faxes.
>
> I have received an anonymous threat from fax number 0171-219-6101 (the
> machine gave its name as "ETRA-HoC") which said, "Stop sending to this
fax
> no 0171-219-6101 or else" (the consequences of continued transmission
were
> unspecified). I invited the sender to apologise for his threat, but
> received no response.
>
>
> This all adds up to quite a severe reaction to my faxes of the last few
> weeks. I actually find this quite heartening since it shows that my
faxes
> are finding the mark and there may yet be a breakthrough in my efforts
to
> expose the Security Service conpiracy of abuse against me which has now
> been going on for eight years.
>
>
> MI5 Persecution: "Why would they be doing this to you, sir?"
>
> This article will concentrate on the difficult question of "Why". The
> question which forms the title of this piece was asked of me by the
police
> officer I spoke to in Easter 1995, when I went to make my complaint.
>
> There are really two sides to this question. Firstly, why should MI5 be
> harassing anybody in this fa****on? Secondly, if they choose to behave in
> this way, why should they have selected me in particular, and not
somebody
> else? Alternatively, why did the persecution start, and why is it
> continuing?
>
> I do not have definite answers to either side of this question, since my
> persecutors have usually kept themselves hidden and only acted through
> other parties. To know "why", one would have to know who the persecutors
> are, and something of their personalities, since their abuse is almost
> certainly symptomatic of a personality disorder of the abusers. Certain
> things however can be deduced about the abusers from the nature of their
> behaviour, and I will talk about this later in the article.
>
> Why did it start?
>
> It is clear that the persecution must have been initiated by someone who
> knew me personally, either at school, or at university, or socially, and
> knew that I was borderline mentally ill, since this is what makes me a
> target for the persecutors. Unfortunately, the originators have never
been
> identified, and there are several possible candidates. Neither has the
> link from the originators of the persecution, to the persecutors
> themselves, ever been made clear. So who are the originators?
>
> University Staff
>
> The identity of the originators may lie in the timing of the
> persecution. It started in June 1990, while I was fini****ng a course at
> Imperial College in London, and a year after I graduated from Cambridge,
> where I received a degree in computer science. At Cambridge I had
achieved
> some notoriety in the computer lab from various nefarious exploits.
Roger
> Needham attacked me by saying that "there were great hopes for it, but
it
> failed terribly". When I started at Imperial I found that my reputation
> had preceded me; Cambridge computer lab had spoken to I.C. lecturers
about
> me. I.C. lecturer Frank McCabe summed up commenting about "setting up a
> straw man so you can tear him down". (Despite being "torn down" by the
> Cambridge computer labs lecturers, I still achieved a good first degree
> and a Masters degree at Imperial.)
>
> Other students at university
>
> So, the originators may have been university staff who knew me from my
> student days. But there are other possibilities. I had other enemies at
> university, including some fellow students. At my Cambridge college it
was
> common knowledge that my mental health was dubious, and it was known
that
> I talked to myself in my sleep - the floor and walls were quite
permeable
> to noise, so other students heard. I was given the nickname
> "gibber" because of this habit. Sometime later, I managed to catch
myself
> talking in my sleep when I woke up in the middle of the night.
>
> Here is a quote from a participant in the internet newsgroup where I
have
> been posting for the last three years;
>
>> One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple
>> prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his admitted
>> mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by
>> now-influential ex-students of his university.
>
> People I knew socially
>
> I had yet other enemies in 1990 (I am a man of many enemies!). In
January
> 1990 I broke up with some people I had been going out with socially. One
> of them, by the name of Andy Turner, wrote a letter to Alan Freeman, who
> at the time was a Radio 1 DJ. Freeman read part of the letter out on his
> Rock Show, about the "one who wore out his welcome with random
precision",
> saying "thats a hell of a letter you wrote there Andy", and "with a
> schizophrenic youre never alone".
>
> It is my belief that Andy Turner and his friends were trying to make
> trouble for me, and Turner wrote to Freeman with this in mind. Freeman
may
> have discussed the letter with others, and things may have snowballed
from
> there. This is, of course, pure supposition. The fact is that I do not
> know who the originators are, and can only guess.
>
> Once it started, why is it continuing?
>
> The answer to this question is obvious. It is unacceptable to the
"powers
> that be" in the UK to have somebody running around who knows he has been
> targeted by the Security Service and media organizations, and who is in
a
> position to embarrass British institutions. This has become particularly
> evident in the last week; as I send more faxes to UK politicians and
> media, so the pressure on me grows, and the volume of abuse increases.
>
> Part of the reason the persecution continues is in the personalities of
> the abusers, and it is this subject to which I will turn to next, since
> the key to understanding the persecution lies in understanding those who
> carry it out, as much as we can.
>
> The Security Service operatives, the persecutors, are they psychopaths?
>
> Let us first examine the definition of the term "psychopath". DSM-IV
> defines "anti-social personality disorder" as a "pattern of disregard
for
> and violation of the rights of others ... deceitfulness, irritability
and
> aggressiveness ... consistent irresponsibility and lack of remorse". The
> Harvard Mental Health Letter of Sept 1995 describes these people as
using
> "charm, manipulation, intimidation and violence to control others and
> satisfy their own needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for
others,
> they cold-bloodedly take what they want and do as they please", having
"no
> guilt or regret".
>
> I must say, reading this description of the condition, that it fits the
> persecutors perfectly. The persecutors have never shown the slightest
> remorse or guilt. Even when I was severely ill, they continued to abuse
> me. They have repeatedly blamed their actions on me, which is another
> trait common amongst psychopaths. They have no respect for my legal or
> personal rights, and they use intimidation and verbal violence.
>
> If the MI5 operatives are psychopaths then it would explain both why the
> persecution started, and the degree of verbal violence. Psychopaths by
> definition damage other people; here, the MI5 operatives find an outlet
> for their personality disorder, through "cripple-kicking".
>
> Xenophobia on the basis of mental illness, and race
>
> My enemies have made clear many times that one of the reasons they are
> persecuting me is because of my admitted mental illness. However, it is
my
> belief that they are also persecuting me because I am not of ethnic
> English origin, and the fact that there have been several incidents of
an
> overtly racist nature reinforces this view.
>
> In one case, two youths on a tube train in London made openly racist
> references to me as a "soft toy, not up to British Standards". Another
> person near my home made remarks about "Polish people". In yet another
> incident in Croydon, a youth made comments about "foreigners".
>
> But the main thrust of their xenophobia is because of my mental illness.
I
> should make clear that I do not look ill; if you met me, you would not
> know that I had the illness. I take a relatively low dose of medication,
> and feel quite well. But the persecutors have repeatedly harped on about
> my supposed serious mental illness; they have called me a "nutter", a
> "schizophrenic", etc. They have also persuaded other people to use these
> terms of abuse. They are able to get away with this because abusing the
> mentally ill is still something which is mostly acceptable in Britain;
the
> media do it, "nutter" is not taboo in the way that "nigger" is.
>
> Conclusion
>
> There are several groups of people who might have wished to cause me
> trouble, and I still do not know who originated the persecution. Nor do
I
> know how the originators came to be in contact with the
> (presumed) Security Service operatives who have been carrying out the
> campaign. To know conclusively why it started, we would have to know who
> started it, and this information is not available.
>
> However, we can infer some things about the personalities of the
> persecutors from their methods, and from the degree of verbal violence
> they employ. It is clear that a main reason for the continuing
harassment
> is the psychopathic disorder of the MI5 agents who carry it out. That
they
> have never been "brought to book" for their misdeeds reinforces their
> belief that they do no wrong; and, unhappily, until they are brought to
> book, their persecution campaign looks set to continue.
>
> 10129
>
>
> --
> Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
> ------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
> Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
---
Get the passwords:
http://artofhacking.com/etc/passwd
|
