Hello.
Would anyone who replies to this thread (and any others replying to
MI5victim) please take *alt.forestry* OFF of the reply ****tion of the
list by deleting it?
The alt.forestry community is trying as much as possible to keep
alt.forestry a forum for those who wish to discuss forestry matters.
This post has nothing to do with forests or trees.
We would certainly appreciate your cooperation.
Thank you.
Geoff
MI5Victim@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> From: rael@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Rael A. Fenchurch)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british
> Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
> Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996
>
> Mike,
>
>
>>"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my
situation
>>but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee
thanks, they
>>do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling
you "oh
>>but it's your fault". It's a mad world.
>
>
> Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
> copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
> you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
> main reasons we all think you've truly gone fi****ng. So?
>
>
> Rael...
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.midnight.org/rael/)
---
> --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time"
---
> --- "Doubt or
Die" ---
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
==========================================================================
>
> From: Andy Howard <andy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british
> Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
> Reply-To: andy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996
>
> In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> bu765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Mike
Corley) wr
> I got a few
>
>>"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my
situatio
>>but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy".
>
>
> Which Labour MP Mike?
>
> --
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Andy Howard EMail andy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
> | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are).
|
> | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed
|
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ====================================================================
>
> Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
> Newsgroups:
uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$
> Followup-To:
uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$
> References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<4h45nq$87o_002@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <4h6gkb$ivc$
> Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> Distribution:
>
> Mike Corley (bu765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
> : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
> : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
> : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
> : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fi****ng. So?
>
> : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing,
I
> : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can
find
> : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have
it.
>
> I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will
keep
> useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time".
>
> The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web
page I
> find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his
address as
> having been jeff.rooker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know where I got the
> address from. I'm so disorganised!
>
> ====================================================================
>
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british
> From: J.J.Smith@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(John J Smith)
> Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K.
> X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk
> Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sender: smid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(RFC931)
> Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd
> References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT
> Lines: 54
>
> In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Mike Corley <bu765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Mike Corley (bu765@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
) wrote:
>>: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned
>>: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment,
>>: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the
>>: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fi****ng. So?
>>
>>: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing,
I
>>: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can
find
>>: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have
it.
>>
>>I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will
keep
>>useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time".
>
>
> Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have
that.
>
>
>>The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web
page I
>>find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his
address as
>>having been jeff.rooker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know where I got the
>>address from. I'm so disorganised!
>
>
> I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote:
>
> Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known
> Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you
> Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted
> Smid>by MI5.
>
> Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address
> Smid>available if you require).
> Smid>
> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the
> Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the
> Smid>email in which he did so..
>
> Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have
> Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is
schizophrenic
> Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are
> Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd
> Smid>be nice...
>
> Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however.
>
> His reply, surpise, suprise was:
>
> MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of
> MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted
> MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do.
>
> Your move, Mike.
>
> Smid
>
> 9222
>
|
