On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:05:19 GMT, jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(marques de
sade) wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:44:06 -0100, David <dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:30:20 -0700 (PDT), "Mr. Smartypants"
<shrubkiller@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jul 4, 4:45 am, Goo wrote:
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-****er and moronic cracker -
lied
>>>> and presented no challenge:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-****er and moronic cracker -
lied and presented no challenge:
>>>>
>>>> >>> You have never even indicated that you can comprehend
>>>> >>> my view of animals
>>>> >> I comprehend it in all its idiotic wrongness, Goo, and I have
fully explained
>>>>
>>>> >> the wrongness of it. It depends on "pre-existence", Goo - Goo:
fits you
>>>> >> like a glove - and it is utter bull****. You do not understand
animals, Goo.
>>>> >> You only understand a weird, Southern Baptist, anthropomorphic and
WRONG view
>>>> >> of animals.
>>>>
>>>> >> You're stupid, Goo - a stupid cracker.
>>>>
>>>> > LOL! You have never indicated that you can,
>>>>
>>>> Of course I have "indicated" that, Goo, you stupid pig-****ing
cracker.
>>>> I "indicated" it by *doing* it, you moron.
>>>
>>>
>>>When did you do that? How come no one saw it?
>>
>> And most curiously: Why can't he produce any example(s) of
>>him doing it? All he can produce is examples of him lying about
>>it...not refuting it or even trying...just lying. As yet he has never,
>>in all these years, even acknowledged what I believe. If he ever
>>does, only then can he begin the what I consider to be futile
>>task of trying to refute it. Maybe the Goober has enough sense
>>to know he can't refute it either, and maybe that's why he's never
>>going to make the attempt.
>
>who cares...
Those who care.
|
