On Jul 3, 10:26=A0pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 11:35 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Jul 2, 11:17 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>> On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >>>>>> You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue.
=A0=
I showed
> >>>>>> conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bull****
"ineffici=
ency"
> >>>>>> argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
> >>>>>> environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel,
aft=
er
> >>>>>> waving it weakly for a few minutes.
> >>>>>> What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
> >>>>>> position of ignorance, anyway? =A0I guess it must have been your
u=
sual
> >>>>>> partisan****p.
> >>>>> Just to comment on this one more time,
> >>>> [snip worthless **** hemorrhage]
> >>>> Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession,
=
was
> >>>> sufficient.
> >>> Still think
> >> Yes. =A0You should try it.
>
> > That wouldn't be just the tiniest bit lame
>
> No.
>
> > As soon as you *finally*, after all these years, got round to
> > presenting some actual evidence for your claim that some vegans make
> > an argument purely based on "efficiency", I conceded your point like a
> > real man.
>
> Not quite. =A0You then went back, as the ***** you are, and responded
> again in the thread, and here we are. =A0You don't have anything to say,
> having conceded, but you just couldn't let the thread die with your
> concession. =A0Being a *****, you just had to add something and keep
goin=
g.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well, make up your mind what the problem is. The problem is that I
continued to post to the thread, is it? Well, you had things to say
that I wanted to respond to, seems pretty reasonable to me. If you
think what I had to say was irrelevant you have the option of not
replying.
Could you just snip the question "Is 'axiomatisable' a real word?" for
me just one more time and *then* say I'm not a real man, so that I can
have another good laugh?
Is "axiomatisable" a real word?
|
