Rupert wrote:
> On Jul 2, 11:17 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. I
showed
>>>> conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bull****
"inefficiency"
>>>> argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
>>>> environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel, after
>>>> waving it weakly for a few minutes.
>>>> What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
>>>> position of ignorance, anyway? I guess it must have been your usual
>>>> partisan****p.
>>> Just to comment on this one more time,
>> [snip worthless **** hemorrhage]
>>
>> Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession, was
>> sufficient.
>
> Still think
Yes. You should try it.
|
