On Jul 2, 11:17=A0pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 1:04 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> You sure did slink away quietly from the "inefficiency" issue. =A0I
sho=
wed
> >> conclusively that ****witted "vegans" see their bull****
"inefficiency"=
> >> argument against meat as something entirely separate from an
> >> environmental argument, and you just threw in the white towel, after
> >> waving it weakly for a few minutes.
>
> >> What the **** possessed you to argue for so long from such a weak
> >> position of ignorance, anyway? =A0I guess it must have been your
usual
> >> partisan****p.
>
> > Just to comment on this one more time,
>
> [snip worthless **** hemorrhage]
>
> Your first comment, acknowledging the lame and feckless concession, was
> sufficient.
Still think "axiomatisable" is not a real word, Ball?
When you snip and evade this question, will that be just a tiny bit
lame?
You finally got around to adequately arguing your point, and when I
saw an adequate argument I agreed with you. Nothing lame there.
|
