Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cooking > Vegan > Re: Jonathan Ba...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 3274 of 3365
Post > Topic >>

Re: Jonathan Ball's theory debunked...again

by "Mr.Smartypants" <bcpg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 2, 2008 at 10:30 AM

On Jul 2, 2:42=A0am, Rudy Canoza <notgen...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-****er and moronic cracker -
> lied and presented no challenge: Goo - ****wit David Harrison, fat pig-
> ****er and moronic cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Rudy V. Canoza wrote:
> > >Chive Mynde wrote:
> > >> "Dutch" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
<news:idUIa.249053$3C2.725=
3513@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > >>> "Chive Mynde" <chive_my...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >>>news:9fedb1f3.0306202316.736358b3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>> Goo wrote in message
> > >>> =A0<news:3EF2A4A5.2040100@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > >>>>> Chive Mynde wrote:
> >
>>>>>>http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=3DhealthNews&storyID=3D=
2956439
>
> > >>>>>> "The most common reason vegetarians gave for choosing their
diet=
 was
> > >>>>>> health and nutrition, while 19 percent said they had done so to
> > >>>>>> control their weight. Only 15 percent of study participants
said=
 they
> > >>>>>> became vegetarians out of concern for animals."
> > >>>>> That's nice
> > >>>> Yes, it's nice that I've debunked you...again.
>
> > >>>>> We're talking about
> > >>>>> "vegans", not merely vegetarians. =A0"vegans" are a much
> > >>>>> smaller subset of vegetarians.
> > >>>> No, you clearly stated that the vegans in question were "ethical
> > >>>> vegetarians", and that's an exact quote. =A0You can't wiggle out
o=
f
> > >>>> another lie, Mr. Canoza.
>
> > >>>> You've been fully debunked, as usual.
>
> > >>>> You appealed to a hasty generalization, and you were shown to be
> > >>>> wrong, as usual.
>
> > >>>> "Only 15 percent of study participants said they became
vegetarian=
s
> > >>>> out of concern for animals."
>
> > >>>> You've been corrected, Mr. Canoza.
>
> > >>>> HTH.
> > >>> It helps show that once somebody gets under your skin you lose all
> > >>> consciousness and become a complete moron.
>
> > >> Nobody "gets under my skin". =A0And the facts are quite clear. =A0I
=
did
> > >> not forge anyone on alt.food.vegan, unlike Mr. Canoza and Mr.
Brando=
n.
> > >> Mr. Canoza also sent a virus to my hugs2horses.com email address.
>
> > >Bull****. =A0Didn't happen.
>
> > =A0 =A0 Rudy, I seriously doubt
>
> Goo, you're a stupid pig-****ing lying cracker, and no one cares what
> you believe or "seriously doubt".



Interesting.............you don't deny sending the virus.



>
> Coming into existence is not a "benefit" to animals, Goo. =A0You lose.-



Now you change the subject to throw everyone off the virus thingy.

Boobs as a clown you are brilliant. No one does it better, but as a
slick operator you are totally inept.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Jonathan Ball's theory debunked...again
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-07-02 10:30:10 
Re: Jonathan Ball's theory debunked...again
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-07-03 13:02:53 
Re: Goo's - Fuckwit David Harrison's - entire life dissed...agai
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-07-03 10:12:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 10:17:45 CDT 2008.