On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, the Goober desperately howled:
>On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:02:36 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pointed out:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:00:23 GMT, Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>Rupert wrote:
>>>> On Jun 9, 6:22 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>> Ron Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>> Wanda Tinasky wrote:
>>>>>>> You clowns need to get a room. Eh, why, is this crossposted to
>>>>>>> alt.satanism?
>>>>>> The devil made me do it.
>>>>> That's ironic, a satanist whining about crossposting. Hey Wanda,
>>>>> shouldn't you be busy planning Armageddon?
>>>>
>>>> It would seem that you do not know very much about Satanism.
>>>
>>>They wor****p The Prince of Darkness, and whine about crossposting. What
>>>more do I need to know?
>>
>> The vast majority of them are strong atheists:
>>_________________________________________________________
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_and_strong_atheism
>>. . .
>>Strong atheism is a term generally used to describe atheists who accept
>>as true the proposition, "gods do not exist". Weak atheism refers to any
>>type of non-theism which falls short of this standard.
>>Because of flexibility in the term "god", it is understood that a person
could
>>be a strong atheist in terms of certain ****trayals of gods, while
remaining a
>>weak atheist in terms of others.
>>Historically, the terms negative and positive atheism have been used to
>>denote this distinction. Within negative or weak atheism, philosopher
>>Anthony Kenny distinguishes between agnostics, who find the claim
>>"God exists" uncertain, and theological noncognitivists, who consider
>>all God-talk to be meaningless.[1]
>>
>>Since many self-described agnostics specifically distinguish their
stance
>>from that of atheists, yet would also fit the general definition of
"weak
>>atheism," the validity of this categorisation is disputed. Another
problem
>>is whether "strong" atheists must consider themselves able to prove
>>authoritatively that a god does not exist, or rather, if they must only
>>disbelieve in such a god in order to qualify.
>>. . .
>>ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
>>who are ashamed of their own faith, apparently in everything they
>>have faith in. So far it appears to me that they have been influenced
>>by what Howard Levey told them to believe in his Satanic Bible, which
>>is that God and Satan do not exist. If they do of course we can expect
>>that Satan uses and laughs at such people who disbelieve in his
>>existence because of his own influence over them...
>
>Shut the **** up, Southern Baptist cracker.
Why don't you want people to learn the truth about "Satanism",
Goo?
|
