Rupert wrote:
> On Jun 10, 4:35 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Jun 11, 4:32 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 10, 4:00 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 6:22 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ron Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Wanda Tinasky wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You clowns need to get a room. Eh, why, is this crossposted to
>>>>>>>>>> alt.satanism?
>>>>>>>>> The devil made me do it.
>>>>>>>> That's ironic, a satanist whining about crossposting. Hey Wanda,
>>>>>>>> shouldn't you be busy planning Armageddon?
>>>>>>> It would seem that you do not know very much about Satanism.
>>>>>> They wor****p The Prince of Darkness, and whine about crossposting.
What
>>>>>> more do I need to know?
>>>>> You don't need to know anything, but it might be advisable to avoid
>>>>> commenting on a subject you know nothing about. It's reasonable to
>>>>> object to cross-posting.
>>>> I find the idea of a "SATANIST" being reasonable hilarious and ironic
on
>>>> the face of it.
>>> Yes, but you're basing that on a set of clichés and a complete lack of
>>> knowledge about the groups of people who actually identify as
>>> Satanists.
>> I don't care what they identify as, they aren't "satanists", that is
>> they do not wor****p the Lord of Evil from Hell, and that is without
>> knowing anything about them. If they did, they would embrace
>> crossposting as a welcome evil influence. They have taken over the name
>> because it sounds cool, no doubt. Let me guess, they believe that
>> self-interest is good and altruism is deluded.
>>
>
> You can look it up on Wikipedia if you're fascinated; you don't appear
> to be and of course that's fine. As I say, it's silly to make any
> remarks about it when you know nothing about it.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> That is the extent of my interest in it.
>>> Sounds fair enough to me.
>>>> I couldn't care
>>>> less if "satanism" has evolved into some yuppie quasi-religion, it is
>>>> SATANISM, get it? The black hooded robes, the torture of small
animals,
>>>> the human sacrifices, the rise of Beelzebub and the descent into the
>>>> eternal foulness of Hell? Get a sense of humor man.
>>> I think I do have a sense of humour, but you and I occasionally
>>> disagree about what is funny. Never mind.
>>>> Besides it's not reasonable to complain about cross posting, its
****ing
>>>> gay.
>
> Incidentally, my cousin is gay and she is as good a person as you, at
> the very least. I think that using "gay" as an insult is a lot lamer
> than objecting to cross-posting.
>
>>> Why is that, exactly? Why isn't she entitled to complain about people
>>> polluting her newsgroup with rubbish?
>> Complaining about cross posting on an unmoderated alt group is lame,
its
>> control freakdom, and futile. She needs to get a real newsreader and
>> kill the thread there. She has a real email address in her headers FGS.
>
> It's not "control freakdom". She simply pointed out that the thread
> didn't belong in alt.satanism. It's a perfectly reasonable point to
> make. It's a lot more sensible than anything you've said in this
> conversation.
Whatever you say, but "she simply pointed out" is a little bit of a
mischaracterization, her wording was "You clowns need to get a room."
Given that kind of provocative rhetoric, I doubt if she is a damsel
needing defending.
|
