Goo - ****wit David Harrison, admittedly stupid cracker - lied and
presented no challenge:
> On Wed, 28 May 2008, Rudy K. Canoza wrote:
>
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, admittedly stupid cracker - lied and
>> presented no challenge:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:27:10 -0700 (PDT), crisology
<crisology@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On May 26, 10:04 am, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, admittedly stupid
cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2008 03:05:11 -0700 (PDT), crisology
<crisol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, admittedly stupid cracker - lied and
presented no challenge:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:01:30 GMT, "sumbeotch at s***bum dot ***"
<youwantmya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>> The meat industry
>>>>>> Is largely government subsidized.
>>>>> Good for all of us.
>>>> all of us = those who would rather be fed than feed themselves.
>>>>
>>>> all of them = the ones feeding all of you.
>>> All of us.
>> *NONE* of us. Subsidies are bad. They distort prices and in effect
are
>> making a choice for people that people ought to be making for
themselves.
>
> Try explaining it Rudy.
Done, numerous times. You already know it, Goo.
>>>>>>> provides life for the animals that it
>>>>>>> slaughters, and the animals live and die as a result of it
>>>>>>> as animals do in other habitats.
>>>>>> Well, it's a little different process in the wild..
>>>>> Yes. In the wild the animals never have food provided
>>>> Wild animals live much longer/naturally.
>>> Since most wild animals die as infants or very young,
>>> the average lifespan would be much less.
>> You don't know what you're talking about. He's comparing wild animals
>> with domestic livestock that are mostly slaughtered at less than a year
>> old, ****wit. You're deliberately making a false comparison, ****wit.
>
> Rudy, the majority of wild animals don't live long at all but are
> killed usually as prey while very young.
Prove it. It's undoubtedly false, and in any case irrelevant.
MEANWHILE, Goo, the vast majority of livestock animals don't live even
three months, Goo.
Goo. That fits you like a glove.
>>>>> so they often have to struggle and suffer over food.
>>>> So they adapt to feed themselves
>>> They suffer more than domestic animals.
>> Irrelevant,
>
> May be Rudy,
No, it *is*, Goo.
>> and not something you could prove anyway. It is not
>> "better" for the universe if we prevent wild animals from suffering by
>> forcing them into extinction.
>
> Why do you think it is better in the case of livestock, but not
> better in the case of wildlife, Rudy?
It isn't about the animals, Goo. You are so stupid.
>
>>>> & the species evolves thusly & enjoy
>>>> natural pleasure of suckling, mating, longer life, etc
>>>> .
>>>>> They also have to do so over territory"
>>>> And earn mating priveleges.
>>> They suffer more.
>> Irrelevant. You aren't "helping" wild animals by promoting livestock
>> over them.
>
> There's no good reason to try ignoring the lives of
> livestock
I don't ignore them, Goo. I just don't give them the nonsensical
"consideration" that you urge others to give, which in fact *you* do not
give yourself, Goo. First of all, Goo, your "consideration" is absurd
nonsense; what you mean by it is that existence is a "benefit" to
livestock animals, and it is clear that it is not. Second, Goo, your
"consideration" is a sham: *you* don't give it. All you care about is
the products, Goo. This is not in dispute.
>>>> And I already told you I'm happy to see the raccoon (like last night)
>>>> in my backyard stealing fruit/veg. The difference is I didn't have
to
>>>> go out and carve out more of his habitat and kill additional animals.
>>> If you don't, someone else will have to do it instead.
>> No.
>
> Someone, or their dog, or their car...will end up
> killing it,
No, Goo, not necessarily. It might just die.
>>>> Are you really looking for solutions to preserving wildlife or are
you
>>>> trying to sup****t a meat industry despite nutritional/environmental
>>>> issues?
>>> I'm pointing out aspects of the situation
>> You are not. You do not "point out" anything. You bull****.
This is not in dispute, Goo.
>>>>>> a fraction
>>>>>> of the natural predators (coyote/native cats, etc) surviving today
are
>>>>>> already being out competed/extinguished without much protection for
>>>>>> this reason.
>>>>> Good.
>>>> Good that you kill wildlife?
>>> Some of them.
>>>
>>>> What's your aim,
>>> To get people to consider
>> No.
>
> In order to get a more realistic interpretation, people
> should think beyond the restrictions
Goo: stop with the truly ****y comedy. You, Goo, are the mentally
restricted one.
|
