Re: Challenging the [snip cracker Goo****wit bull****]

On May 23, 2:04=A0pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Goo: =A0you do *not* present a challenge - ever. =A0You *CANNOT*.
>
> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a staggeringly
> stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 21 May 2008 13:24:37 -0700, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a staggeringly
s=
tupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>
> >>> On Wed, 21 May 2008, Rudy X. Canoza wrote:
>
> >>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the one and only Goo and a
staggeringly=
 stupid cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Rudy G. Canoza wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Why did it take so long, Goo?
> >>>>> =A0 =A0Probably perturbations
>
> >>>> you do *not* know the meaning of the word 'perturbation', Goo.
>
> >>>>>> Why haven't you learned in over NINE years, Goo, that your entire
"=
take"
> >>>>>> on the issue of animal "rights" is bull****? =A0
> >>>>> =A0 =A0How do you think pointing out the fact
>
> >>>> You do not "point out" any fact, Goo; nor do you "challenge"
anyone.
>
> >>>> Your answer was a non-sequitur, Goo. =A0I asked you why you haven't
l=
earned,
> >>>> in over NINE years of futility here, that your entire "take" on the
i=
ssue of
> >>>> animal "rights" is bull****? =A0Answer the question, Goo. Your take
*=
is* bull****,
> >>>> and we want to know why you haven't been able to figure that out in
o=
ver NINE
> >>>> years of ****ing around here.
>
> >>>>>> There are valid, logical and moral reasons for opposing "ar"
> >>>>> =A0 =A0Yet you have repeatedly indicated that
>
> >>>> No, Goo. =A0*I* have elaborated logical and correct opposition to
"ar=
".
>
> >>> =A0 =A0As I correctly predicted
> >> No, Goo. =A0You did not "predict" anything,
>
> > =A0 =A0 In contrast to that lie
>
> No, Goo. =A0No lie. =A0You did not "predict" anything. =A0You spewed
more
> cracker bull****; that's all.
>
> You do not "predict", you do not "point out", you do not "challenge".
> You're a stupid cracker, Goo - you have *ADMITTED* it. =A0You're just
> jerking off here. =A0You're a lifelong jerk-off - not a serious
> contributor at all.-


How's my system time Mr. Serious Contributor?