Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cooking > Vegan > Re: animal test...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3233 of 3408
Post > Topic >>

Re: animal testing

by dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM

On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:53:12 -0700 (PDT), rtamiru@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>Hello there,
>
>I am doing a project about alternative to animal testing if you can be
>able to share me your thought  that would much appreciated.
>
>Ruth.
_________________________________________________________
If scientists could replace animal research and testing
with methods which did not need to use animals then
they would.

There are several reasons for this:

    *  Scientists do not like or want to use animals in research. 
Like the vast majority of people they do not want to see animals 
suffer unnecessarily. In fact less than 10% of biomedical research 
uses animals. Unfortunately for much of the work involved in 
biomedical research there are as yet no working alternative 
techniques that would allow us to stop using animals.

    * Biomedical research is producing thousands of new compounds, 
which may have potential as new drugs. It is much more efficient to 
screen these compounds using rapid non-animal techniques to test 
their effectiveness and toxicity.

    * The very high standards of animal welfare and care required of 
British research establishments are a contributory factor in making 
animal research very expensive. If scientists can develop alternatives 
to using animals it will allow them to divert their limited research funds

to other areas of research.
[...]
http://www.bret.org.uk/noan.htm
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
[...]
From the bald eagle to the red wolf, biomedical research has
helped bring many species back from the brink of extinction.
Conservation and captive breeding programs, often using
fertilization techniques developed for humans, have made it
possible for these animals to be reintroduced into the wild, and
today their numbers are growing. Biologists and wildlife
veterinarians rely on the latest research in reproduction, nutrition,
toxicology and medicine to build a better future for our wild
animals. 

In vitro fertilization, sperm banks and artificial insemination were
all developed to help human couples, but today they also are
regularly used to ensure the survival of endangered species. 
[...]

http://fbresearch.org/helpingwildlife.html
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
WITHOUT ANIMAL RESEARCH:

Polio would kill or cripple thousands of unvaccinated children and 
adults this year.

Most of the nation's one million insulin-dependent diabetics wouldn't 
be insulin dependent -- they would be dead.

60 million Americans would risk death from heart attack, stroke or 
kidney failure from lack of medication to control their high blood 
pressure.

Doctors would have no chemotherapy to save the 70% of children who 
now survive acute lymphocytic leukemia.

More than one million Americans would lose vision in at least one eye 
this year because cataract surgery would be impossible.

Hundreds of thousands of people disabled by strokes or by head or 
spinal cord injuries would not benefit from rehabilitation techniques.

The more than 100,000 people with arthritis who each year receive hip 
replacements would walk only with great pain and difficulty or be 
confined to wheelchairs.

7,500 newborns who contract jaundice each year would develop cerebral 
palsy, now preventable through phototherapy.

There would be no kidney dialysis to extend the lives of thousands of 
patients with end-stage renal disease. 

Surgery of any type would be a painful, rare procedure without the 
development of modern anesthesia allowing artificially induced 
unconsciousness or local or general insensitivity to pain.

Instead of being eradicated, smallpox would continue unchecked and many 
others would join the two million people already killed by the disease.

Millions of dogs, cats, and other pets and farm animals would have died 
from anthrax, distemper, canine parvovirus, feline leukemia, rabies and 
more than 200 other diseases now preventable thanks to animal research.

http://www.ampef.org/research.htm
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
We live longer and healthier lives than ever before. Animal research has
improved the treatment of infections, helped with immunisation, improved
cancer treatment and had a big impact on managing heart disease, brain
disorders, arthritis and transplantation. My own field, the prevention of
genetic disorders in babies, has been possible only because of humane
work on animals.

Animal rights activists talk about cruelty and torture, some backing their
assertions by publi****ng out-of-date photographs of "experiments"
banned long ago. This is a misrepresentation.
....

Some so-called anti-vivisection organisations would have people believe
that animal research does not work. This is simply a lie. Animals do not
give information that is 100% accurate when applied to humans, but they
do provide invaluable information that cannot be replaced by computer
modelling, cell culture or human experimentation. Mice have virtually the
same genes as humans, which is why they are so useful for exploring
human physiology.

Animal research has contributed to 70% of the Nobel prizes for physiology
or medicine; many award-winning scientists say that they could not have
made their discoveries without animals. Polio would still be claiming
hundreds
of lives a year in Britain if it wasn't for animal research by the Nobel
laureate
Albert Sabin. "There could have been no oral polio vaccine without the use
of innumerable animals," he once said."
....

The last big drug disaster in the UK happened because of a lack of animal
research. Four decades ago, when thalidomide's awful effects were
revealed,
the drug was returned to the lab to be tested on pregnant animals for the
first
time. Birth defects were quickly seen in mice and rabbits. This prompted
an
overhaul of the legislation and is the basis for our laws on drug
development.
....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1786503,00.html#article_continue
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: animal testing
dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-22 10:36:17 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 11:13:00 CST 2008.