Re: Challenging the Goober to oppose the gross mi$nomer "ar"

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Goo lied:


>On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:10:45 -0100, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 May 2008, the Goober wrote:
>>
>>>Why did it take so long, Goo?
>>
>>    Probably perturbations in the flux of spacetime in this region
Goober.
>>
>>>Why haven't you learned in over NINE years, Goo, that your entire
"take" 
>>>on the issue of animal "rights" is bull****?  
>>
>>    How do you think pointing out the fact that it wouldn't provide 
>>better lives, longer lives, more lives or ANY lives--much less provide
>>"rights"--for domestic animals is bull**** Goob, do you have any idea?
>>
>>>There are valid, logical and moral reasons for opposing "ar"
>>
>>    Yet you have repeatedly indicated that you aren't aware of a single
>>one of them, Goo. If you think you are finally aware of any and capable
>>of explaining it/them, I challenge you to try doing so now. GO:
>>
>>
>>
>>(prediction: the Goober will be unable to present any, wussing off
>>in a most inept and cowardly way)
>
>No, Goo.  *I* have elaborated logical and correct opposition to "ar". 

    As I correctly predicted Goober you can not do it. You can't
now, you never could, and you will never be able to. You have
completely failed the challenge. The challenge still stands though
Goo, so try. We can't say try again because as I predicted you 
wussed off in a most inept and cowardly way without trying at
all, so try doing it now Goo:


(correct prediction: the Goober will as always be unable to
present opposition and be forced to go the coward's way again)