Re: The Irrational 'Search for Micrograms (of Animal Parts)'

On Mon, 19 May 2008, Goo pointed out:

>the stupid ****wit moooooshki lied:
>
>> On May 17, 9:29 pm, Laurie <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> sumbeotch at s***bum dot *** wrote:> not all vegans are idealistic
****tards....ff the spam ng's
>>>
>>>         Thanks for proving my point!
>>>         Vulgarity is all you have.
>>>         You have no ability to refute anything I said.
>>>
>>>> ... do your reading.
>>>         Why don't you use your own obviously extensive "reading"
>>> to provide a polite, intelligent response?
>>>         Don't have the ability??
>>>
>>>         Why don't you trim off the irrelevant ng's?
>>>
>>>         Laurie
>>>
>>> --
>>> Scientifically-credible info on plant-based human
diets:http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html
>>> news:alt.food.vegan.science
>> 
>> 
>> 1. Some vegans do, in fact, care nothing for animals; are
>> vegan only for the better health aspect.
>
>Bull****.  No one is "vegan" for health reasons.  One might be 
>vegetarian for (poorly thought out) health reasons, but not "vegan". 
>"vegan" means eschewing *all* animal products, not just foods, as well 
>as some products tested for safety on animals.  Nobody refuses to wear 
>leather shoes or wool trousers because he feels it's inherently
unhealthful.

    That's true Goo, and if it's easy enough for you to understand it
then it should be easy enough for anyone to understand it. So it
brings questions to mind, like:

1. Are these people who try to create the impression that they don't 
understand really too stupid to comprehend, or are they dishonestly 
pretending to be for some reason?

2. Why do they want to promote the false impression that there
are people who are vegan for reasons that don't involve animals?

You being the most dishonest person I've ever encountered should
have an idea why they do it Goob, but of course that doesn't mean
you'll be honest about what it is. Why are you even honest about
the fact that they're being dishonest, btw? Now that we mention it,
in the VAAAAAAAAAAAST majority of cases it's you who is the
dishonest party, not "the other guy", so what strange quirk put you
on the honest side for a change, Goo?