Re: The Irrational 'Search for Micrograms (of Animal Parts)'

the stupid ****wit moooooshki lied:

> On May 17, 9:29 pm, Laurie <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> sumbeotch at s***bum dot *** wrote:> not all vegans are idealistic
****tards....ff the spam ng's
>>
>>         Thanks for proving my point!
>>         Vulgarity is all you have.
>>         You have no ability to refute anything I said.
>>
>>> ... do your reading.
>>         Why don't you use your own obviously extensive "reading"
>> to provide a polite, intelligent response?
>>         Don't have the ability??
>>
>>         Why don't you trim off the irrelevant ng's?
>>
>>         Laurie
>>
>> --
>> Scientifically-credible info on plant-based human
diets:http://ecologos.org/ttdd.html
>> news:alt.food.vegan.science
> 
> 
> 1. Some vegans do, in fact, care nothing for animals; are
> vegan only for the better health aspect.

Bull****.  No one is "vegan" for health reasons.  One might be 
vegetarian for (poorly thought out) health reasons, but not "vegan". 
"vegan" means eschewing *all* animal products, not just foods, as well 
as some products tested for safety on animals.  Nobody refuses to wear 
leather shoes or wool trousers because he feels it's inherently
unhealthful.