Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?

On Oct 16, 8:56 am, arch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> Nevr a word about "processed" nor "nuts" passed my finger tips in this
> thread to my recollection.

Read the post From: arch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 06 Oct 2008 15:14:49 GMT

If you go through your post at that time, in order to try to justify
milk compromised diets you compared it to the contents of everything
from soy, cereals, wheat products and peanuts. The enthememe was if
those foods are popular we can digest milk as well. My point is that
none of those foods exemplify natural/optimal diet contents/all being
compromises anyway. It was like claiming since someone else smokes it
must be healthy for me too.

> you repeatedly refer to yourself as "we" and now you say "your" instead
of
> 'my'. Will you explain this consistent/inaccurate referencing of
> yourself and others?"
>
> No doubt my unorthodox quoating markup practices.

I now see the instance you quoted Laurie without the '<<' but w/quote
marks spaced far from the message. That was my misperception so I was
incorrect about the misuse of "your" in that message. But I'm mainly
talking about when you consistently refer to yourself as 'we', while
not quoting anybody.

C.