On Sep 18, 7:28 pm, arch...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > " IF you were supposed to consume milk, it would be human
> > milk and your mother should be providing it for you; can she?"
>
> > About 10 k years ago those humans who had begun to consume milk
> > after the domestication of cattle, sheep, etc. genetically evolved
> > a mutation in the production of the enzyme lactase by which to
> > continue the metabolism of milk after infancy.
>
> " The sign on the door is a.f.v.SCIENCE.
> Sup****t your allegations with credible citations, or politely
> withdraw them."
>
> Sorry, your commentdoes not meet the criteria of our beloved leader.
Arch, it was YOUR OWN comment. Many of your comments are mysterious
enough without further confusing who you are talking to with what you
are talking about. (e.g., rambling about processed cereal, soy & nuts
where they are not in question or examples that would justify even
less healthy alternatives of interspecies milk). So it would seem you
are talking to yourself if more than one person isn't sharing your
screen name/persona. It is not an accident that you repeatedly refer
to yourself as "we" and now you say "your" instead of 'my'. Will you
explain this consistent/inaccurate referencing of yourself and others?
C.
|
