"Although you may find it suspenseful to anticipate humans ever evolving
to share metabolism of calves or evolving to metabolize species-specific
milk of other mammals, foreign milk has "made available a new domain of
diseases not previously commonly available at ones doorstep, so to
speak." This is evidenced in the response of human immune systems that
recognize & attack the antigens in milk across species. There is a
consensus that measurable antibody levels reflect these disease risks
(which you refer to as "no problem"). Type 1 diabetes continues to
increase and there is a ~55% higher risk of Type 1 diabetes for children
drinking cows' milk. -Cows' milk exposure and Type 1 diabetes mellitus:
a critical overview of the clinical literature." Diabetes Care 17
(1994). 13-19."
Evolution of the mutation was the topic. Evolution requires only that a
mutation have enough benefit that on balance it is greatly increased in
the coming generations. To have a stable aditional source of food tilts
the benefit toward the mutationnbbecause any negitive effects are far
from universal and tend over time to be weaned from the gene pool .
As to the other issues you raise, could be, there is no concensus on it.
The diabetes and tie continues to be a matter of no concensus, look at
that publication date. One can find other studies since that say
otherwise and which say no or answer not clear, as is so often the case
in questions ****h as these.
"Because of the specific contents of cows' milk, there are many
additional autoimmune diseases, cancers, macular degeneration,
Alzheimer's, etc that are dose-dependent/positively associated with
human consumption of foreign milk."
Would b happy to review relevantt web based studies. We obviously need
to use only domestic milk.
|
