Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cooking > Vegan Science > Laurie - Whats ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 25 Topic 410 of 477
Post > Topic >>

Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?

by "TheAM" <grant.rorrison@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 15, 2008 at 03:34 PM

Hi Laurie,

 Have you seen this hypothesis on calcium intake and how it conceivably
relates to osteo****osis? I wondered what your take was on it? I posted it
on the vegsource raw-vegan forum, the one hosted by 'your mate', Dr Doug
Graham. A more likely friend of yours, John Coleman, gave it short shrift,
claiming that it was written by 'misguided people' who 'misrepresent
scientific-findings' and assured me that we humans need to make sure we
get 'plenty' (whatever that means!) of calcium. But then Coleman once told
me that another article i sourced (about menstruation) was 'full of
errors', never really clarified what they were and simply informed me it
was 'natural' and that chimps had been observed menstruating, both in the
wild and in captivity. Maybe the ones in captivity aren't being fed their
correct diet (?) and the ones in the wild were foolish enough to suck on
that meat juice, or gather some insects, causing internal toxicity?  

 Anyway, what do you think of it? It seems self-apparent to me that -any-
excess of -any- nutrient will play a detrimental role on the organism and
possibly wear out any structures or functions relating to it, similar to
how excess protein damages the kidneys and more. Or the strain placed upon
the gall bladder and liver, in the inuit, from consuming too much fat,
causing swollen organs. 


 http://www.4.waisays.com/ExcessiveCalcium.htm

 

--
Message posted using
http://www.talkaboutcooking.com/group/alt.food.vegan.science/
More information at http://www.talkaboutcooking.com/faq.html
 




 25 Posts in Topic:
Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
"TheAM" <gra  2008-06-15 15:34:08 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-06-30 11:12:10 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-21 02:06:44 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-21 09:54:32 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
sunt_eu_picasso@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-22 17:54:39 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-05 20:22:02 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-07 19:49:06 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-09-18 18:13:46 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-18 23:28:52 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-10-05 15:43:52 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-05 20:21:02 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
crisology <crisology@[  2008-09-24 21:06:13 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-25 17:49:36 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-10-06 04:38:14 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-06 15:14:49 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
crisology <crisology@[  2008-10-09 10:28:13 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-09 21:11:18 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
Laurie <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-10-06 02:15:49 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-06 15:11:24 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
crisology <crisology@[  2008-10-06 14:12:49 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-06 22:04:09 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
crisology <crisology@[  2008-10-06 17:36:35 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-08 14:32:55 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
crisology <crisology@[  2008-10-09 00:26:31 
Re: Laurie - Whats your view on this hypothesis?
archaea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-10-09 21:58:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 23:43:38 CDT 2008.