Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cooking > Food Safety > Re: Sanitizing ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 75 of 155
Post > Topic >>

Re: Sanitizing kitchen

by "Spod Reed" <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 24, 2005 at 05:47 PM

Rod Speed wrote:
> Spod Reed <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Rod Speed wrote:
> >> Spod Reed <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>> Rod Speed wrote
> >>>> Spod Reed <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>>>> Rod Speed wrote
> >>
> >>>>>> Lie. Doesnt explain why the use of bleach in hospitals hasnt
> >>>>>> stopped those antibiotic resistant organisms in their tracks.
> >>
> >>>>> It does on the surface it's being applied to.
> >>
> >>>> Lie, it isnt even possible to apply it to all surfaces effectively.
> >>
> >>>>> Tell us how using bleach on a kitchen counter will "breed better
> >>>>> bugs".
> >>
> >>>> The same way that anything that doesnt kill 100% does, cretin.
> >>
> >>> Still waiting for an answer instead of your moronic babbling.
> >>
> >> Lying, as always.
> >>
> >>> Explain how that would work with "physical action"?
> >>
> >> Already did, repeatedly.
> >>
> >> ANYTHING THAT DOESNT KILL 100% WILL BREED RESISTANCE.
> >
> >> That is just as true with a bullet to the head, as I already said.
>
> > Using your logic, if I shot at a herd of twenty deer and only kill
> > 19, the one I missed will evolve into a bullet-proof super deer.
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never had a
> ****ing clue about the basics of evolution, or anything else at all,
either.
>
> >>> While you may physically miss a germ with the bleach,
>
> >> That aint the only possibility. The other obvious possibility
> >> is that some of the germs dont get hit with a strong
> >> enough bleach solution to kill them, cretin.
>
> > But that wouldn't make them any stronger against bleah AS YOU CLAIM,
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never had a
> ****ing clue about the basics of evolution, or anything else at all,
either.
>
> >>> it won't be any stronger so explain how  it will grow better.
>
> >> Pathetic, really.
>
> >>> If you haven't got a real answer
>
> >> Already have, repeatedly.
>
> > Nope.
>
> Yep.
>
> >>> than shut the **** up.
>
> >> Go and **** yourself.
>
> >> And you STILL havent managed to explain why, if bleach will
> >> kill all germs, WE STILL SEE ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT GERMS
> >> CAUSING MASSIVE PROBLEMS IN HOSPITALS TODAY.
>
> > There you go yet again confusing antibiotics with disinfectants.
>
> Lying, as always.
>
> > Antibiotic resistant germs are transmitted by improperly sanitized
> > equipment, surfaces and hygene, that's why there are still problems,
>
> Have fun explaining how come the worst bugs were a
> massive problem before antibiotics had even been invented.
>
> > Ebola is antibiotic resistant but bleach will kill it dead
>
> Have fun explaining how come the worst bugs were a
> massive problem before antibiotics had even been invented.
>
> > "A physician with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
> > describes the first order of business when he and his colleagues
> > arrived at Kikwit General Hospital, the main locus of transmission for
> > Ebola: "We just went in, cleaned the floor, removed the needles,
> > removed the cadavers, put them in body bags, did the cleaning."
> > Wearing protective clothing, they cleared out and carefully disposed
> > of the vomit, urine, excrement, dirty needles, and dead bodies,
> > liberally applying bleach solution to everything. They instituted
> > basic sanitary procedures, including the wearing of gloves and face
> > masks. Thus was the "doomsday disease" conquered.
>
> Have fun explaining how come the worst bugs were a massive problem
> before antibiotics had even been invented where that approach didnt
work.
>
> > "The fact of the matter was that Ebola hemorrhagic fever, along with
> > Marburg and Lassa, were diseases of poverty and bad hospitals," writes
> > Regis. "Although they thrived momentarily when they erupted in such
> > environments, those same viruses were stopped cold every time they
> > turned up in well-equipped medical institutions....Common and ordinary
> > items such as rubber gloves, plastic gowns, and face masks could halt
> > an epidemic. A killer virus itself could be killed by a liberal
> > application of household bleach. [T]hose items, mundane and boring as
> > they were, had been the very things that had terminated the Ebola
> > outbreak in Kikwit."
>
> Have fun explaining how come the worst bugs were a massive problem
> before antibiotics had even been invented where that approach didnt
work.

Don't have to Dick Rod, poor hygene and sanitation practices have been
around a long time contributing to the problem.

> > You are wrong.
>
> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed pig ignorant fantasyland.

Still waiting for those examples Rod. Wow, you've been up all night
posting!
Sucks having no life, no job and no friends.
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Sanitizing kitchen
"Spod Reed" <  2005-09-24 17:47:31 
Re: Sanitizing kitchen
"Rod Speed" <  2005-09-25 11:00:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 1:29:47 CST 2008.