Beeblebrox wrote:
> Spod Reed wrote:
> > Rod Speed wrote:
> >
> >>Spod Reed <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>
> >>>Rod Speed wrote
> >>>
> >>>>Picilli <feranija@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> >>
> >>>>>Browsing web pages, I see everybody suggests bleach that contains
> >>>>>sodium hypochlorite to sanitize sponge, utensils, to kill
salmonella
> >>>>>and other foodborne bacteria on a countertop, fridge handle,
kitchen
> >>>>>sink, especially after handling meat and poultry.
> >>
> >>>>>Why only bleach ? OK, it may be an excellent sanitizer, but
> >>>>>aren't 99% propanol or ethanol just as effective disinfectants ?
> >>
> >>>>>Remembering chemistry lessons from school I
> >>>>>don't think any bacteria will ever survive alcohol.
> >>
> >>>>>There either must be some advantage of bleach over alcohol (price
> >>>>>maybe), or once upon a time someone mentioned bleach and everybody
> >>>>>is over and over again rewriting the same advice with bleach on
> >>>>>their web pages, forgetting there are other effective sanitizers ?
> >>
> >>>>It makes no sense to 'sanitize' the kitchen, that just breeds better
bugs.
> >>
> >>>More Rod Speed bull****.
> >>
> >>We'll see...
> >
> >
> > Yes we will, just keep reading.
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Bleach and alcohol do nothing of the sort.
> >>
> >>Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
> >>that you've never ever had a ****ing clue.
> >
> >
> > You're showing your ignorance. Keep up the good work.
> >
> >
> >>>"Better bugs" are the result of antibiotics (triclosan for
> >>>instance in a cleaning product) being used to kill bacteria.
> >>
> >>Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
> >>that you've never ever had a ****ing clue.
> >
> >
> > More ignorance. Keep going. (Damn, Rod just hates it when he's proven
> > wrong)
> >
> >
> >>ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
> >
> >
> > Yeah right, like your shoe? Bwahahahahaha!
> >
> >
> >>>Bleach and alcohol kill bacteria and
> >>>viruses by causing physical damage.
> >>
> >>ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
> >
> >
> > Wrong again. Why not be a MAN and admit you're mistaken?
> >
> >
> >>>Germs have no chance to develop
> >>>antibiotic resistance to physical damage
> >>
> >>Duh.
> >
> >
> > Duh, but you're arguing about it. I guess that makes you the moron.
> >
> >
> >>>and thus would not "breed better bugs".
> >>
> >>ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
> >
> >
> > What part of PHYSICAL DAMAGE are you having a problem with? That's how
> > disinfectants work, micro-organisms cannot build up a resistance to
> > physical damage no matter how hard you try and prove otherwise. You
are
> > WRONG. Deal with it dumbass.
> >
> >
> >>If it was anything like your stupid pig ignorant
> >>claim, hospitals would use bleach and or alcohol
> >>and would never see any better bugs bred.
> >
> >
> > They use other disinfectants that work the same way as well as bleach
> > (think ebola) and alcohol hand sanitizer.
> >
> > We see better bugs bred through the use of anti-biological agents and
> > their improper usage, not through the use of disinfecting agents.
> >
> > "Quat-based disinfectants carry a positive charge. Bacteria, viruses
> > and fungi carry a negative charge. When a bacteria-laden surface is
> > sprayed or mopped with a disinfectant, the charge distribution of the
> > bacteria cell changes from negative to positive. This results in the
> > disruption of the bacteria cell wall and eventual death to the
> > microbe."
> >
> >
> > You're wrong once again. Not start you crying like you always do.
> >
>
>
> In this case the original troll was correct and you are wrong, whoever
> you are. Rod is correct on this one.
Your ignorance of "physical" action is amazing.
A human can develop a resistance to a disease, but he will never
develop a resistance to a bullet to the head. That's why disinfectants
work the way they do. They are the bullet to the head of the bacteria
or virus.
|
