Rod Speed wrote:
> Spod Reed <rhalford1961@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> > Rod Speed wrote
> >> Picilli <feranija@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
>
> >>> Browsing web pages, I see everybody suggests bleach that contains
> >>> sodium hypochlorite to sanitize sponge, utensils, to kill salmonella
> >>> and other foodborne bacteria on a countertop, fridge handle, kitchen
> >>> sink, especially after handling meat and poultry.
>
> >>> Why only bleach ? OK, it may be an excellent sanitizer, but
> >>> aren't 99% propanol or ethanol just as effective disinfectants ?
>
> >>> Remembering chemistry lessons from school I
> >>> don't think any bacteria will ever survive alcohol.
>
> >>> There either must be some advantage of bleach over alcohol (price
> >>> maybe), or once upon a time someone mentioned bleach and everybody
> >>> is over and over again rewriting the same advice with bleach on
> >>> their web pages, forgetting there are other effective sanitizers ?
>
> >> It makes no sense to 'sanitize' the kitchen, that just breeds better
bugs.
>
> > More Rod Speed bull****.
>
> We'll see...
Yes we will, just keep reading.
>
> > Bleach and alcohol do nothing of the sort.
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
> that you've never ever had a ****ing clue.
You're showing your ignorance. Keep up the good work.
> > "Better bugs" are the result of antibiotics (triclosan for
> > instance in a cleaning product) being used to kill bacteria.
>
> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
> that you've never ever had a ****ing clue.
More ignorance. Keep going. (Damn, Rod just hates it when he's proven
wrong)
> ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
Yeah right, like your shoe? Bwahahahahaha!
> > Bleach and alcohol kill bacteria and
> > viruses by causing physical damage.
>
> ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
Wrong again. Why not be a MAN and admit you're mistaken?
> > Germs have no chance to develop
> > antibiotic resistance to physical damage
>
> Duh.
Duh, but you're arguing about it. I guess that makes you the moron.
> > and thus would not "breed better bugs".
>
> ANYTHING that kills bugs breeds better bugs, ****wit.
What part of PHYSICAL DAMAGE are you having a problem with? That's how
disinfectants work, micro-organisms cannot build up a resistance to
physical damage no matter how hard you try and prove otherwise. You are
WRONG. Deal with it dumbass.
> If it was anything like your stupid pig ignorant
> claim, hospitals would use bleach and or alcohol
> and would never see any better bugs bred.
They use other disinfectants that work the same way as well as bleach
(think ebola) and alcohol hand sanitizer.
We see better bugs bred through the use of anti-biological agents and
their improper usage, not through the use of disinfecting agents.
"Quat-based disinfectants carry a positive charge. Bacteria, viruses
and fungi carry a negative charge. When a bacteria-laden surface is
sprayed or mopped with a disinfectant, the charge distribution of the
bacteria cell changes from negative to positive. This results in the
disruption of the bacteria cell wall and eventual death to the
microbe."
You're wrong once again. Not start you crying like you always do.
|
