Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Cooking > Professional Food Preparation > Re: Viking rang...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 38 Topic 105 of 176
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Viking range quality

by Dave Smith <adavid.smith@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 28, 2005 at 12:23 PM

normandc69@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> I considering getting a Viking dual fuel 48" range for the houe were
> building. I've read old posts of Viking's quality is not good. I'm
> wondering if the quality of their products has gone up since the late
> 90's, early 2000's. If the quality is not up there what would you get
> instead?
>

I had a Viking range. I had a hard time baking things in it. I was
advised to use better baking pans because it was "high efficiency".
Results were better but not great. A few years ago I got a Maytag. Things
that turned out badly in the Viking were excellent in the Maytag, and the
only difference was the range.




 38 Posts in Topic:
Re: Viking range quality
 Dave Smith <adavid.smi  2005-09-28 12:23:53 
Re: Viking range quality
 dim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2005-09-28 18:54:16 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-09-28 21:47:23 
Re: Viking range quality
 Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2005-09-28 18:57:12 
Re: Viking range quality
 Dave Smith <adavid.smi  2005-09-28 19:04:26 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-09-29 02:40:41 
Re: Viking range quality
 spope33@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-29 06:07:06 
Re: Viking range quality
 Dave Smith <adavid.smi  2005-09-28 18:00:28 
Re: Viking range quality
 Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2005-09-28 18:55:49 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Doug Kanter" &  2005-09-28 23:02:41 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Matthew L. Martin&q  2005-09-28 19:08:10 
Re: Viking range quality
 Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2005-09-28 19:40:10 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Matthew L. Martin&q  2005-09-28 22:58:02 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Dee Randall" &  2005-09-28 20:53:48 
Re: Viking range quality
 dim@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2005-09-29 22:14:16 
Re: Viking range quality
 Dan Abel <dabel@[EMAIL  2005-09-29 23:40:18 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Dee Randall" &  2005-09-29 20:53:11 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Pete C." <a  2005-09-30 01:02:04 
Re: Viking range quality
 Dan Abel <dabel@[EMAIL  2005-09-30 01:25:43 
Re: Viking range quality
 Walter Spector <w6ws_x  2005-09-30 16:35:39 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-10-01 02:58:37 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Del Cecchi" &l  2005-09-30 22:40:54 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-10-01 03:49:34 
Re: Viking range quality
 "FDR" <_remo  2005-10-01 06:53:46 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Pete C." <a  2005-10-01 14:00:47 
Re: Viking range quality
 "FDR" <_remo  2005-10-01 14:59:16 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Pete C." <a  2005-10-01 15:59:48 
Re: Viking range quality
 "FDR" <_remo  2005-10-01 17:19:24 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Pete C." <a  2005-10-01 18:26:53 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Pete C." <a  2005-10-01 18:26:53 
Re: Viking range quality
 Tony P. <kd1s@[EMAIL P  2005-10-01 16:01:24 
Re: Viking range quality
 Kenneth <usenet@[EMAIL  2005-10-01 18:11:08 
Re: Viking range quality
 Alan Moorman@[EMAIL PROTE  2005-10-02 18:04:34 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Del Cecchi" &l  2005-10-01 14:35:34 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-10-01 23:33:52 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Matthew L. Martin&q  2005-10-01 19:55:19 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-10-01 03:49:34 
Re: Viking range quality
 "Edwin Pawlowski&quo  2005-10-01 02:58:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 9:52:15 CDT 2008.