In article <MPG.21c4f52efa57aa9698da8c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Sena
<arjfatcymoeddorguk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>me9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said...
>> On 7 Dec,
>> Sena <arjfatcymoeddorguk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > The Peugeot, despite earlier indications to the contrary, is
driveable
>> > today. If it tips down again like that though, I'll take the Imp. Ee,
>> > they don't make them like they used to...
>>
>> I don't know what vintage of peugeot you have,
>
>Neither do I. Er, <counts> 91, I think. H reg, anyway.
>
>> but I managed to 'hydraulic' a
>> P306 diesel a few years ago in not very deep water. The shape of the
bumper,
>> and the position of the air intake, pointing forward and down just
above the
>> bumper make it exceedingly easy to get water into the works.
>
>Oops.
>
>[...]
>
>> They are now building 'Executive Homes' on this site (now called
>> Watermeadows), starting at 2/3 of a million each. I dont think any
locals
>> would touch them with the proverbial.
>>
>Good grief. How on /earth/ did they get planning permission? Surely
>they will fail on basic survey findings?
>
Search me.
Planners sometimes recommend sensibly - see:
http://waverweb.waverley.gov.uk/live/wbc/newcomdb.nsf/828998c245e6cdb0802
5735300310117/80256d2600382038802573ae0058a231/$FILE/Appendix%20A.pdf
Broadly - smallish Surrey town maybe not the best place for nine-storey
block of flats, etc, etc. Planning committee meeting next Tuesday.
Control of council has changed since scheme was started, BTW.
<waves to GBG/L/V before dozing off over Lapsang soochong>
--
Peter
|
